| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Beachcomber Transforumer

Joined: 06 Mar 2007 Posts: 3963 Location: Vancouver, BC
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 11:51 am Post subject: Star Trek: Year Four #5 Reaction Thread |
|
|
Year Four #5 is out now, so post your thoughts on this issue here!
Remember, if you'd like your message to appear in a letters column, mark it "OK To Print". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
8of5 Forum Zombie
Joined: 07 Mar 2007 Posts: 412
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I found it disappointing, I was starting to get quite enthusiastic about this series and thinking maybe David Tischman had finally managed to get things together and then we get this. Bleh, just the whole premise doesn't make sense, if two stations comparable to K-7 had been built to conduct some mega experiment then what the heck happened to the research team that had been developing this for years? Why was the Enterprise even there let alone doing the whole thing!?
That quibble aside there was just nothing too it; experiment goes wrong, oh no Spock's in trouble, bother Spock's dead, oh, he isn't... "The Immunity Syndrome" anyone? And the art really didn’t help here, I mean what on earth was the point in pages six and seven - stars, stars, stars, stars... oh yeah and that blue blob is doing something up there. Once again this issue shows up the horrible idea of the fixed panel layout of four wide panels per page irrespective oh how that helps the pacing or fitting a nice chunk of story in, so much wasted space in this issue.
I don't think it helped that this came out along side the Orion Alien Spotlight, which had a story with so much more going on, and much more interesting and in-depth artwork. It's a real shame, the idea to play of the CERN experiment (though rather presumptuous that CERN is going to be a disappointing failure), and the way it was set up - that first page with the separating stations was coool, but oh dear what a wasted opportunity. To quick, not enough to it, a real disappointment. I hope the final issue of the series manages to get back some of better quality other issues have managed. _________________ Numerically challenged drone
8of5's Star Trek blog -- Updated October 14. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GustavoLeao I'm kind of a big deal
Joined: 11 Mar 2007 Posts: 247
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ro-Dan Transforumer

Joined: 18 Aug 2007 Posts: 2215 Location: Royal Oak, Michigan
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It wasn't a very memorable issue. It didn't help that this followed the clever story and beautiful art of the previous issue. And why the heck was the Joe Corroney cover the incentive? _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
indianatrekker27 Slayer
Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 58
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 6:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| yeah, this issue didnt blow me away either. It felt very rushed. I did feel like I was watching a replay of "The Immunity Syndrome." I can't stand the four panel thing either. The reality TV story and Gordon Purcell drawn issue have been the strongest two stories in my opinion. I'm glad that Purcell will be back to do the final issue. I wish he had done the artwork for the whole series. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ro-Dan Transforumer

Joined: 18 Aug 2007 Posts: 2215 Location: Royal Oak, Michigan
|
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Speaking of the "reality TV series" issue (my favorite of the series) I hope that IDW has plans for the Sharp Bros in the future. These guys are scary talented. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Aric Transforumer

Joined: 19 Nov 2007 Posts: 634 Location: Orlando, FL. USA
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I thought this was the strongest of the Conley issues. I loved the gemini stations and I thought the quark cloud was rendered beautifully. This one also had the best characterizations other than isssue #4. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
8of5 Forum Zombie
Joined: 07 Mar 2007 Posts: 412
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Aric wrote: | | I loved the gemini stations and I thought the quark cloud was rendered beautifully. |
That was what I found one of the weakest parts of the issue, a lot of space was given to showing that cloud, it needed to be a big part, to tell the story effectively. But mostly it was a big blue blob, it didn't help much tell the story at all, just used up space. I think if the art had been stronger in this issue it would have worked a lot better. _________________ Numerically challenged drone
8of5's Star Trek blog -- Updated October 14. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ro-Dan Transforumer

Joined: 18 Aug 2007 Posts: 2215 Location: Royal Oak, Michigan
|
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Despite the criticisms there are some strengths in this issue. Once again, Tischman nails the characters "voices" and personalities. The Chekov scenes were quite good and I liked Kirk's apology to Arex. Little things like that nice. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
8of5 Forum Zombie
Joined: 07 Mar 2007 Posts: 412
|
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ro-Dan wrote: | | Despite the criticisms there are some strengths in this issue. Once again, Tischman nails the characters "voices" and personalities. The Chekov scenes were quite good and I liked Kirk's apology to Arex. Little things like that nice. |
Yeah he manages to get the character stuff spot on every time.
I think if IDW want to use him again they need to team him up with someone else who can sort out the actual story parts of the issue and let Tischman do his thing with the character moments. _________________ Numerically challenged drone
8of5's Star Trek blog -- Updated October 14. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samy I'm kind of a big deal
Joined: 02 Jul 2007 Posts: 174
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Art: C. Serviceable but little more can be said. The splash on pages 6-7 was a waste of space.
Story: C. Nothing particularly special. I still think there's a lot of space being wasted when a fourth of an entire page is wasted on "I owe you an apology". Could've been included in the previous panel, or it could've been a smaller panel leaving more room for other stuff. Things like that have been prevalent in ST:YF, wasting a lot of space and giving an undense story. The Arex/Kirk conflict -- the only real personality conflict in the issue -- was also very downplayed, making the whole issue seem kind of watered down when there was no big clash between any personalities. The end tried to salvage it a little bit but it was just the same old same old Spock being unemotional -- seen it a hundred times. Can't say there was any particularly strong point in this issue. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|