| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
destro! I'm kind of a big deal

Joined: 18 Feb 2011 Posts: 131
|
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 11:44 am Post subject: Marvels ARAH: The deceased |
|
|
I am wondering if anyone here has a list or remembers all of the deceased Joes/Cobras from Marvels ARAH?
I see that Heavy Metal is on Cover 173 http://dewaynes-world.popshop.comixology.com/item/OCT110337/G-I-Joe-A-Real-American-Hero-173-10-Copy-Incv but as snakeeater pointed out, HM is dead. Hoping this was intentional and not an error...maybe he is connected to Speak Peak.
Maybe we can send a cheat sheet onto the editors at IDW to help them out, just in case? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hellstrom Transforumer

Joined: 27 Mar 2008 Posts: 897 Location: sc
|
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 12:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That would require two things.
A) An editor who is actually doing their job and editing the book. Paying attention to stuff like this and saying something to the writer about it.
and more important like I have said before...
B) That the writer on the book actually gives a crap about what he wrote in past issues.
I can understand the Sneak Peak mistake somewhat because as I understand it? Larry only reread back to Marvel #145 and that issue did not list Sneak Peak on the list of the dead. Ok. I get that much. I'll accept that. His comments on it are one of the reasons I dropped IDW ARAH. Now if this is not a "symbolic" or "generic" comic cover and this dead guy actually appears in the issue? Then you might as well accept two things.
A) Larry Hama has in fact been given "free reign" on the book.
and
B) That's not the good thing a lot of people think it is.
But then again some people will accept it and make excuses for why it's ok for Larry to do anything he wants with the book. As I have dropped the book? It's no longer relevent to me, but it's going to be interesting to see the comments on this one. Should Heavy Metal actually appear inside the issue that is to say. _________________ The cake is a lie. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
destro! I'm kind of a big deal

Joined: 18 Feb 2011 Posts: 131
|
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am hoping that it is explained, I was happy when he corrected the Sneak Peak error. I will say: I would not be interested in this series if it partly re-launched/re-wrote itself but kept the consecutive numbers going...my brain could not handle that insanity.
I can handle resurrections, it is a comic book after all, but I cannot handle contradictions to a story line. Crossing fingers, hoping to be here for the long run. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hellstrom Transforumer

Joined: 27 Mar 2008 Posts: 897 Location: sc
|
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| destro! wrote: | I am hoping that it is explained, I was happy when he corrected the Sneak Peak error. I will say: I would not be interested in this series if it partly re-launched/re-wrote itself but kept the consecutive numbers going...my brain could not handle that insanity.
I can handle resurrections, it is a comic book after all, but I cannot handle contradictions to a story line. Crossing fingers, hoping to be here for the long run. |
But that's my problem with the book. The writer seems to think he does not owe the readers an explination and while I can understand this is a comic book and people come back to life? This is NOT a superhero book and ressurections should be limited somewhat. Especially on lesser characters like Sneak Peak. That's all I am trying to say about the whole thing. Plus the story they actually "died" in looses any weight and meaning if they are brought back later. _________________ The cake is a lie. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
m6d I'm kind of a big deal

Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 244 Location: Austin, TX
|
Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Really? They did it again?
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antarctica Forum Zombie

Joined: 29 May 2008 Posts: 492 Location: Swaziland, Africa & Los Angeles
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CrazyK Transforumer
Joined: 14 Mar 2009 Posts: 1107 Location: Newbury Park, CA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hellstrom wrote: | A) Larry Hama has in fact been given "free reign" on the book.
and
B) That's not the good thing a lot of people think it is.
|
I've been saying this for MONTHS now... _________________ "I... I don't believe it..."
"That. Is why you fail..." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hellstrom Transforumer

Joined: 27 Mar 2008 Posts: 897 Location: sc
|
Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CrazyK wrote: | | Hellstrom wrote: | A) Larry Hama has in fact been given "free reign" on the book.
and
B) That's not the good thing a lot of people think it is.
|
I've been saying this for MONTHS now... |
Yeah, but is it sinking in for everyone yet? Plus I know some people will still rush to this books defense. I know at least 2. When will it be enough is enough for everyone to see? _________________ The cake is a lie. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shanecdavis Transforumer
Joined: 11 Jul 2008 Posts: 1779 Location: Saratoga Springs, UT
|
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 4:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'll definitely come to the defense of this book. Was the Marvel run edited perfectly without ANY errors? Hardly. They created the No-Prize for a reason folks. The DDP run was no better. We've seen wandering word balloons before. We've seen dead Joes on covers before (Marvel #155 anyone???). The only real problem I've had with ARAH was Sneak Peek showing up when he really shouldn't have. Now, that was a BIG deal to me. That said, the way Mr. Hama is handling it so far is very interesting to me and I cannot wait to see how it all works out.
I haven't seen the cover to #173 yet (and don't plan to until I have to add the sticky post) so I can't comment too much on it, other than to say I could care less if Heavy Metal is on the cover, as long as he doesn't appear inside of it.
Did seeing Quick Kick on the cover of this issue, or Tommy in attendance for that matter, ruin the story for anyone? I thought it was dumb when I finally got my hands on one, but Quick Kick never showed up within the pages so it wasn't a big deal to me.
I refuse to let minor editor faux pas take away from the enjoyment of what is otherwise just a very well written and drawn story. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antarctica Forum Zombie

Joined: 29 May 2008 Posts: 492 Location: Swaziland, Africa & Los Angeles
|
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Its not that they are minor its that those minor ones are starting to become common mistakes. Like the symbol.
And that is something that just shouldn't happen.
And just wait if they make a mistake with the Arashikage Clan history. The up roar over Sneek Peak will seem small. And even Rockhammer won't be able to defend Hama and most of us hardcore fans will be pissed.
The irony is that the last few issues have been GREAT READS.
It is the Hama we want writing and the Hama stories we want to read. _________________ GI Joe comic fan since 1982
The YO Joe Comic Book Section
&
The YO Joe International Comic Book Section |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
burg Transforumer

Joined: 27 Feb 2009 Posts: 541
|
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 1:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I posted this in another thread, but I just got it on good authority that HEAVY METAL is indeed still dead. The cover that got out was an error and the new version will feature WILDCARD instead. Yo Joe! _________________ WELCOME TO COBRA ISLAND - Download the album here: http://propsdept.bandcamp.com/
"People were talking and eating, it was the greatest party ever." - Snakor's Pizza
Twitter: @SJ_Wordburglar
http://www.wordburglar.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shanecdavis Transforumer
Joined: 11 Jul 2008 Posts: 1779 Location: Saratoga Springs, UT
|
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Antarctica wrote: | Its not that they are minor its that those minor ones are starting to become common mistakes. Like the symbol.
And that is something that just shouldn't happen.
And just wait if they make a mistake with the Arashikage Clan history. The up roar over Sneek Peak will seem small. And even Rockhammer won't be able to defend Hama and most of us hardcore fans will be pissed.
The irony is that the last few issues have been GREAT READS.
It is the Hama we want writing and the Hama stories we want to read. |
I'm not seeing any common mistakes in ARAH. Yes the Arashikage symbol has been done wrong in the other titles and apparently on an upcoming cover, but Shannon has done a terrific job so far and I couldn't be happier. We've had Sneak Peek, which is turning out to be the best mistake Mr. Hama ever did, and a misplaced word balloon. That's all.
Definitely agree with you on the past 4 issues of ARAH being GREAT reads! Can't wait for 171!
| burg wrote: | | I posted this in another thread, but I just got it on good authority that HEAVY METAL is indeed still dead. The cover that got out was an error and the new version will feature WILDCARD instead. Yo Joe! |
Meh. I'd rather it be Heavy Metal! LOL
Check that, I would much rather it be Steeler. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
destro! I'm kind of a big deal

Joined: 18 Feb 2011 Posts: 131
|
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| burg wrote: | | I posted this in another thread, but I just got it on good authority that HEAVY METAL is indeed still dead. The cover that got out was an error and the new version will feature WILDCARD instead. Yo Joe! |
Yes! Another crisis averted. I appreciate IDW for showing they care...I really do. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
abner419 Forum Zombie
Joined: 28 May 2009 Posts: 417
|
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It was all your imagination! Or a clever ploy to keep the fan on their toes!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
m6d I'm kind of a big deal

Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 244 Location: Austin, TX
|
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 5:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Now I just hope they know Wild Card and Heavy Metal don't look the same.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|