IDW Publishing Forums Forum Index IDW Publishing Forums
A home for all IDW fans.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

How Realistic Should G.I. Joe Be?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    IDW Publishing Forums Forum Index -> G.I. Joe
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Veritas
I'm kind of a big deal


Joined: 23 Jul 2011
Posts: 226

PostPosted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 7:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

shanecdavis wrote:
It's funny because I don't accept IDW Zartan. Well at least not how Dixon wrote him. I threw away the first issue of his origins and didn't bother picking up the other two. Just more GI Trek garbage. Instead, I still subscribe to the Marvel origin where Zartan uses holography to "shape shift" rather than his body actually changing shape, which I still cannot believe Andy allowed it to reach print. I never thought I would ever see a worse origin for Zartan than Blaylock's crazy idea over at DDP (which was really bad), but Dixon topped it.


Oh. My. I may just have to go find those issues to see what you're talking about... I have to admit, I only skimmed the Zartan Origins after the first one myself. "Lord, what fools these mortals be!" We do come up with some pretty out there stuff! Laughing
_________________
~CSV
=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Proud GeekMom and JoeMomma!
My Blog: http://csv1026.blogspot.com
My Fanfic (Stargate SG1, GI Joe, Skulduggery Pleasant): http://www.fanfiction.net/~catwings1026
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
maczero
Transforumer


Joined: 08 Jul 2007
Posts: 654

PostPosted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 8:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've grudgingly learned to accept the "out there" sci-fi in the IDW verse because for the most part I enjoyed the writing. However in my perfect Joe-verse, you'd see the following:

1) Joe and Cobra tech would be between 10-20 years ahead of the real world.

2) Destro wouldn't wear an iron mask or a containment suit 24/7.

3) Zartan wouldn't be a shape changing clone or have hologram tech. He'd simply be a skilled master of disguise.

4) No ninja mysticism.
_________________
Need to buy, rent or sell a home in DC or Northern VA, then contact me at realtorva@verizon.net
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shanecdavis
Transforumer


Joined: 11 Jul 2008
Posts: 1782
Location: Saratoga Springs, UT

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 11:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Veritas wrote:
Oh. My. I may just have to go find those issues to see what you're talking about... <snip>

Read at your own risk. Mr. Hama spent an entire issue (Marvel #35) explaining how Zartan used holographic devices to create his "shape-shifting". Blaylock, on the other hand, dismissed that and took a single line from Marvel #48 where Doc says the intruder's blood sample had inhuman properties and turned Zartan into "The Amazing Lizard-Man!!" One of many many reasons why I didn't consider the DDP run to be an official continuation of the Marvel run back then and VERY happy that Hasbro and IDW now don't either.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Machete Phil
Transforumer


Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 750

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

in my ideal joe-verse, the sci-fi levels would be limited to advanced tech about a decade or so out. agree that gi joe definitely needs SOME level of sci-fi... but shape-shifting clones and teleportation are just way too far out there for my tastes.
_________________
But from that point on... Phil Coletti was forever known as... Machete Phil.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Torpedo
Transforumer


Joined: 21 Apr 2011
Posts: 1915
Location: Vermont

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How do you fans feel about characters like Flash and Grand Slam, two of the original team members who embody sci-fi elements in their specialties/functions?
_________________
Author of Mr. Smartass, available for Amazon's Kindle, iPad/iPhone, and other e-reader devices and apps.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Phil Kost
Forum Zombie


Joined: 30 Jan 2008
Posts: 313
Location: Austin, TX

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Torpedo wrote:
How do you fans feel about characters like Flash and Grand Slam, two of the original team members who embody sci-fi elements in their specialties/functions?


Considering there is a section in the Army Range Safety Regulation that governs the use of lasers, I don't have a problem with them.
_________________
ANY and ALL GI Joe comics discussed at
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Torpedo
Transforumer


Joined: 21 Apr 2011
Posts: 1915
Location: Vermont

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Phil Kost wrote:
Torpedo wrote:
How do you fans feel about characters like Flash and Grand Slam, two of the original team members who embody sci-fi elements in their specialties/functions?


Considering there is a section in the Army Range Safety Regulation that governs the use of lasers, I don't have a problem with them.


But are they lasers used for targeting or laser-death-ray lasers?
_________________
Author of Mr. Smartass, available for Amazon's Kindle, iPad/iPhone, and other e-reader devices and apps.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Phil Kost
Forum Zombie


Joined: 30 Jan 2008
Posts: 313
Location: Austin, TX

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Torpedo wrote:
Phil Kost wrote:
Torpedo wrote:
How do you fans feel about characters like Flash and Grand Slam, two of the original team members who embody sci-fi elements in their specialties/functions?


Considering there is a section in the Army Range Safety Regulation that governs the use of lasers, I don't have a problem with them.


But are they lasers used for targeting or laser-death-ray lasers?


Whichever they are, they can injure people, thus making them potential weapons in my book.
_________________
ANY and ALL GI Joe comics discussed at
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
RG1701
I'm kind of a big deal


Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 187

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya know, that's not the most unrealistic concept introduced into Joe, in fact, it's probably one of the most realistic science elements written into the series. I do not call it science fiction, because it's not. We routine create genetically modified animals, such as fish, which glow neon colors, or goats which have a spider gene inserted into their genetic code so they can produce silk webbing in their milk which we harvest for various applications. Spider cows. We've been doing that for the last ten years, and we possibly were able to do it as early as the 80s. Genetic manipulation has been one of the easiest sciences to use, while being amongst the most unpredictable and powerful of the sciences.

In theory, it should be possible to introduce new genetic information, even into an adult, using perhaps a viral medium to introduce the new info throughout the cells. If that were successfully done, it would only be a matter of time until the body started making the new proteins and the chameleon abilities would start to manifest. This stuff is real and is being researched right now. Transhumanism is something we'll all have to come to terms with in the next 15-20 years. I can easily imagine a government already experimenting with the process to create a superior soldier.

In contrast, the high quality holographic projectors Zartan uses are still not available even in 2011 and he had them in the mid-80s!

Another element less credible than the chameleon powers, are the bipedal war bots that are BATS. Our scientists are just now developing bipedal robots, and even then they still need the support of a big metal rod attached to them to keep them balanced. Cobra had them in the 80s.

So, the chameleon powers never bugged me and was the science that could be most easily mastered compared to the other sciences Cobra ended up mastering.

Clone Zartan however, ironically from the "grittier" newer continuity, has no biological basis for his powers as far as I know, and is totally within the realm of science fiction. It's one thing to give a man the ability to change skin color, it's quite another for a clone to randomly pick up the ability to change skin color and bone structure! While, I derive some enjoyment from his character, his funky backstory diminishes it for me.

Stuff like MASS, I would prefer not be in GI Joe but not because it's “science fiction”. Scientists claim to already have teleported single, elementary particles, that is they didn't move from point A to point B via some pathway, but they teleported from A to B without “traveling”. What prevents them from teleporting larger, more complex matter/energy patterns is stuff like the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle which states you can never with 100% accuracy state the position of a particle. That would leave quite a problem for the reassembling of anything.

Yet, that doesn't mean I don't think science will ever find a solution. Which means, I can actually see Cobra developing such a device since it has trillions, no governing laws and no morals to restrict researchers, and is generally 10-15 years ahead of the rest of the world in technology as a consequence. So while I would prefer it not be in Joe because it is improbable that anyone today could make the technological leap required to create the machine, that's not the primary reason I don't accept it because as improbable it could still happen.

No the primary reason I dislike technology like that, is because it's hard to deal with in an adequate logically consistent way. I mean, Cobra stopped using MASS because the recent turmoil prevented them from rebuilding the device. Now that the Civil War is over, why would the new Cobra Commander not want a MASS device of his own? The BET(another feasible bit of technology) would have been a nice countermeasure for MASS, except that the writers haven't quite caught onto that, and so MASS remains unsatisfactorily “resolved”.

It's the same problem I have with the brainwave scanner, which actually was used logically throughout the series, which led to boring and predictable results. I mean yeah, a power mad individual would use a machine like that over and over again to control his underlings. Did that make for interesting stories? Nope. The brainwave scanner is possible though. In fact, the way it works is downright quaint compared to some of the “brainwave scanners” scientists are developing. A few years ago, some scientist claimed they would literally be able to translate data stored in the biochemical machinery of the brain and be able to present it via electronic medium. Two or so years ago, Scientific American had an article claiming that grainy images of what a person was thinking could now be projected on a screen for all to say. So, brainwave scanner is possible, but IMO it should never have been introduced because it allowed for lazy storytelling like MASS it was never satisfactorily dealt with in, either in Marvel/DDP or Marvel/IDW. I mean, in DDP a virus is introduced into the main scanner which corrupts its programming forcing Cobra to rely on the less powerful portable one to control Storm Shadow. The same kind of happens in the IDW continuation of Marvel, except the device gets destroyed outright at the end by Mindbender.

All of that should leave the reader asking WTF though. I mean, Cobra makes billions, possibly more, per year. It employs thousands of engineers and technicians, but even if they all fail to reverse engineer Venom's magic machine, they still have Mindbender, who pioneered the creation of the world's first bipedal war bots(in the 80s!) , developed the machinery and techniques to create a synthetic genetic recombinant man, plus programmed the scanner to give that synthetic man a stable personality, created the technology to clone, created a weather machine, created stealth armor to rival that of nations, left detailed instructions for cloning himself, and he can't help in the reverse engineering of the scanner? WTF?! How does that even make sense? No one in Cobra can? WTF does Cobra R&D do? Sit around a crystal ball waiting for mystical engineering insights? (That may actually explain Mindbender and Crystal Ball :p )

I do have one more reason for not liking MASS and brainwave scanners. They're depressing technology. I read to get away from the real world. When Joe brings that stuff in, it only reminds me of the potential for abuse of such technology. I prefer not to have that reminder in my face.

There are three other “science fiction-y” things I'm totally okay with.

Weather dominators, or Tempest. I always theorized Tempest by ionizing the atmosphere and it looks like I was right:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1343470/Have-scientists-discovered-create-downpours-desert.html

Nanotech. Also something that hasn't bugged me. I remember yet another Scientific American talking about researchers trying to develop programmable nanobots that could hunt down and destroy cancer cells. Weaponization would be an expected evolution.

EMP. Though scientist haven't yet figured out how to create a weaponized EMP without producing a nuclear explosion, I'm sure that's just around the corner. (IDW Joes already have EMP grenades!)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Viceroy
Transforumer


Joined: 11 Jul 2008
Posts: 1289
Location: Manila, Republic Of the Philippines

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 5:56 pm    Post subject: Re: How Realistic Should Joe Be - Science Fiction, or Realit Reply with quote

Veritas wrote:
This might be a good thread to use to discuss the issue of the title being too "over the top" SF.

I've been watching the frequent complaints that G.I. Joe relies too much on science fiction elements, and I'm curious to see how far the anti-SF elements would want to go to make the title "acceptable."

Does anyone remember an episode of Mythbusters that talked about the weaponry that the Nazis were experimenting with? I recall a sonic weapon, and Tesla's "death ray," but not much else. I also maintain that much of what Joe uses is potentially viable technology - yes, teleportation is definitely out there; research is currently being conducted, however. Destro's protective shell? Not realistic in the least, however. But would purists want it removed from the series?

So - anyone up for a techie nitpicking discussion of how much tech is allowable until it becomes "over the top?" No fair referring to ARAH, however... that's continuing with an established continuity that has ALWAY used SF elements liberally. I want to focus on the reboot - is THAT "too SF?" Should it be more technologically realistic? If so... why?


Well, I'm game.
Sci Fi elements have existed in GI Joe since day 1 with the use of Flash and Grand Slam. And of course, we've seen sci fi inspired elements such as Zartan's holograms (NB: in the cartoons, Zartan uses rubber masks. As does Lady J though her file states she doesn't favor such items.) . And then there's the SDI Laser commanded by GI Jane.
Strictly within its military aspects, GI Joe does play it fair. The Ninja element while overused has basis in reality as Ninjas do exist.
In the sci fi element, well, that cuts both ways.
On the realistic side we have Battle Force 2000 that was a spin on the US Army's/US Marine Corps' Land Warrior XXI and Soldier/Marine Enhancement Programs. The rail gun systems seen on the Pulverizer and the hand held versions developed by Dr. Sidney Biggles Jones are under development at the time they were seen on the pages of the comic.
Then there's the Star Brigade Team. As a concept-as with Ninja Force- its cool. What makes it laughable is that a)the figures were for the most part re hashed from existing ones; the SB Roadblock was a riff on the 1991 Gen. Hawk for example; b) they were repeats of established characters. Payload, Sci Fi and Countdown and Spaceshot makes sense, but Duke,Roadblock and Rock 'N Roll? C'mon! Also, the space suits used look like riffs of the Exo frames used by the Centurions. It could have looked sleeker and more resemble Iron Man's armor.
The USS Defiant* was based on the X33 and is quite believable.
On the other side of the coin...
Serpentor's creation stands out. As a kid this may be cool. A riff on the creation of Adam Warlock over at the Fantastic 4. Still, Cobra is just a terrorist group. It lacks the realism and discipline Ian Fleming melded to SPECTRE for example. Also, as a riff to Cobra's realism, how come CC always gets plotted against? At least Baron Strucker of Hydra and Ernst Stavro Blofeld of SPECTRE remain in full command of their groups.
Also, on the sci fi front, how do you justify the Eco Warriors, Cesspool and the Toxo and Zombie Vipers. GI Joe is an Anti Terrorist Team, never an arm of Greenpeace. It should have been ignored.
Then there's Destro's Cataclysm in the DDP series. Destro is an arms dealer, never a naval expert; his Iron Grenadiers never had naval vehicles so why should we believe he can craft a submarine that's a rip off of both the Seaview and the SeaQuest?
Also, on the realism front, how come we never see Asian, black or hispanic Cobra troopers in the ranks?
_________________
"Let us renew our faith and our hope. We have every right to dream heroic dreams!"
-President Ronald W. Reagan
"That's how an author should talk! How manly!"
-Michelle Cheung, R.O.D. The TV
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Torpedo
Transforumer


Joined: 21 Apr 2011
Posts: 1915
Location: Vermont

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 6:08 pm    Post subject: Re: How Realistic Should Joe Be - Science Fiction, or Realit Reply with quote

Viceroy wrote:
And of course, we've seen sci fi inspired elements such as Zartan's holograms (NB: in the cartoons, Zartan uses rubber masks. As does Lady J though her file states she doesn't favor such items.) . And then there's the SDI Laser commanded by GI Jane.


Zartan also turned blue in the cartoon (and toy) and could blend chameleon-like against walls.

Quote:
Also, on the realism front, how come we never see Asian, black or hispanic Cobra troopers in the ranks?


What, terror cells can't be racist, too?
_________________
Author of Mr. Smartass, available for Amazon's Kindle, iPad/iPhone, and other e-reader devices and apps.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Veritas
I'm kind of a big deal


Joined: 23 Jul 2011
Posts: 226

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:06 pm    Post subject: Re: How Realistic Should Joe Be - Science Fiction, or Realit Reply with quote

Viceroy wrote:
Also, on the realism front, how come we never see Asian, black or hispanic Cobra troopers in the ranks?


Torpedo wrote:
What, terror cells can't be racist, too?


Hearts and Minds - the last issue - shows that Cobra does draw from a cross-section of ethnicity, with pretty much all bases covered. I found the bored white kid the scariest of all, honestly... of course, I find most bored, affluent teens pretty scary, being that it's the main demographic of the district I teach in. Shocked
_________________
~CSV
=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Proud GeekMom and JoeMomma!
My Blog: http://csv1026.blogspot.com
My Fanfic (Stargate SG1, GI Joe, Skulduggery Pleasant): http://www.fanfiction.net/~catwings1026
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Veritas
I'm kind of a big deal


Joined: 23 Jul 2011
Posts: 226

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 8:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What a post. Wow!

RG1701 wrote:
Ya know, that's not the most unrealistic concept introduced into Joe, in fact, it's probably one of the most realistic science elements written into the series. I do not call it science fiction, because it's not. We routine create genetically modified animals, such as fish, which glow neon colors, or goats which have a spider gene inserted into their genetic code so they can produce silk webbing in their milk which we harvest for various applications. Spider cows. We've been doing that for the last ten years, and we possibly were able to do it as early as the 80s. Genetic manipulation has been one of the easiest sciences to use, while being amongst the most unpredictable and powerful of the sciences.


Yes, and this is where I agree with you on the "art getting too close to life" part; I am VERY skittish about the whole cloning thing. It's like you noted about the nanotech - first we elimanate birth defects, but then we can program our own customized baby with the "right" hair, eye, skin color... for a price. Oh, Cobra would have a field day with that...

I wonder, what sort of gene splicing would need to be done to give Zartan full automorphic powers? I'd think octopus or squid before chameleon or any reptile - they're downright amazing, and scary smart for a critter with no backbone - no vertebrate has the ability to change the texture of its skin as well as the color, at least none I can think of off the top of my head.

Quote:
Another element less credible than the chameleon powers, are the bipedal war bots that are BATS. Our scientists are just now developing bipedal robots, and even then they still need the support of a big metal rod attached to them to keep them balanced. Cobra had them in the 80s.


I think I'd have been happier if they had them with treads, rather than Terminator-style... that seems to be the direction military robots are taking, at least from what I've seen.


Quote:
Stuff like MASS, I would prefer not be in GI Joe but not because it's “science fiction”. Scientists claim to already have teleported single, elementary particles, that is they didn't move from point A to point B via some pathway, but they teleported from A to B without “traveling”. What prevents them from teleporting larger, more complex matter/energy patterns is stuff like the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle which states you can never with 100% accuracy state the position of a particle. That would leave quite a problem for the reassembling of anything.


I like the "for dummies" translation of the Heisenberg Uncertaintly Principle, really - "The act of measurement affects whatever is being measured so that reality can never be known precisely." I.E. - in order for the MASS device to work, energy must be used to create precise measurements of the object which needs to be transported - however, the energy acts upon the object, affecting it in an indeterminate way, rendering the initial measurement flawed.

Which could have been the problem with the device at the beginning, when the person or object transported was rendered atomically unstable.

I like your detailed explanation of why you don't feel that even potentially scientifically feasible tech is out of place in Joe - very much. I don't mind the SF element, but it's definitely a compelling argument for limiting it.

Quote:
I read to get away from the real world. When Joe brings that stuff in, it only reminds me of the potential for abuse of such technology. I prefer not to have that reminder in my face.


I am very much on board with you there - it took me months to get over the Terminator trilogy, which I watched all at once, and then my husband took me to see The Matrix... sheesh.

My one consolation is that it's still a big deal that scientists have taught a robot how to pair socks, so we're not quite at the moment of truth yet. What's the techie word for when machines become self-aware? The Singularity?


Quote:
Nanotech. Also something that hasn't bugged me.


No pun intended? Hee hee hee...

Quote:
I remember yet another Scientific American talking about researchers trying to develop programmable nanobots that could hunt down and destroy cancer cells. Weaponization would be an expected evolution.


I remember that one, too... just one more tech thing that kinda freaks me out, honestly. It's that horrible line - we should, most definitely, work towards using nanotech to eliminate cancer. But once you open that box... brr. I start getting echos of the film version of Ian Malcolm from Jurassic Park... "Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could that they didn't stop to think if they should!"

Nanotech could, really, replace the whole Brainwave Scanner... I never really saw the point of the device. Sure, as a kid, I loved the whole mind-control step-into-the-subconscious angle... it affected a lot of SF/F writing I did back then, and even now... but as an adult, I'd think that a military organization would be heading more for a direct route to reprogramming the mental computer. They wouldn't want to have to sift through the terrabytes of information coursing through a living computer; what's more, when it comes to thoughts and memories, we're becoming more and more aware that what we think we remember may not be 100% reliable. You'd need to be looking for concrete information (which can still be corrupted in memory - anyone who has frozen when taking an exam knows this!) rather than trying to gain a psychological edge on your enemy, and even then, it's simply not an efficient use of time or personnel.

I guess that this is Heisenberg theory, too - by trying to plumb the mind, the mind is affected by the action, rendering the information harvested questionable.

Nanotech would be a more compelling and effective means mind control, I think. I've seen scientists "drive" a rat using the most basic of manipulations, pain and pleasure, through electrodes implated into the neural cortex; humans are every bit as suceptible to this kind of programming, particularly if it's paired with physical torture. We're all hardwired to respond to pleasure and seek it, and try to avoid pain. Eventually, however, I could see nanobots programmed to interfere with the workings of the human body - you don't answer the question, your heart shuts down for a few beats, or your lungs "forget" to breath. Depending on programming, simple electronic stimulation of certain parts of the human brain turn off the part of us that is suspicious of strangers - manipulate that, and you don't have to coerce a prisoner; he trusts you automatically.

I actually like the idea of nanotech as a mind control device in fiction - it could even have the added scare factor that implanted nanotech could have a lethal kill switch; trying to disable it would trigger a self-destruct, taking out the mental faculties of the host. Any military, terrorist or otherwise, is definitely versed in the scorched earth scenario.
_________________
~CSV
=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Proud GeekMom and JoeMomma!
My Blog: http://csv1026.blogspot.com
My Fanfic (Stargate SG1, GI Joe, Skulduggery Pleasant): http://www.fanfiction.net/~catwings1026
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
RG1701
I'm kind of a big deal


Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 187

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Which is why I had no problem with the plot used in Rise of Cobra. I had a problem with some of its presentation, some of the physical feats performed maybe...definitely the ice sinking in water....but not the nanotech idea itself. It's coming.

I also feel that unlike MASS in IDW Joe, the nanotech plot was dealt with pretty well in Image/DDP Joe continuity. After all, once the Joes had the access codes and were able to take control of the nanites, the weapon was pretty much rendered unusuable by Cobra, lest they risk starting some nanobot Cold War, since the enemy now had a way to counter Cobra's ace in the hole. That has yet to be done satisfactorily with MASS.

Veritas wrote:
I remember that one, too... just one more tech thing that kinda freaks me out, honestly. It's that horrible line - we should, most definitely, work towards using nanotech to eliminate cancer. But once you open that box... brr. I start getting echos of the film version of Ian Malcolm from Jurassic Park... "Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could that they didn't stop to think if they should!"


I hear Ian Malcolm in my head as well whenever some bit of new about disturbing technology comes across my attention! Very Happy

Honestly, it took me a while to pin exactly why MASS bothered me. Yes, like I said, it's not exactly probably that anyone is going to create a workable teleporter anytime soon and yes, it's a hard plot element to get rid of when you introduce it, but honestly, I concluded that I also didn't like it because it horrified me. Scientists have claimed to teleport single fundamental particles. Today. Proof that there's something to the concept. Yes, our theories make it difficult to go beyond single particles...today. What about ten years from now. 20. Once the ball starts rolling, it's hard to stop it. And it made me angry that I had to think about that, because I can only see the potential to abuse the technology. I don't particularly welcome that change into my world. So, yes, I heard Malcolm in my head.

Veritas wrote:

I am very much on board with you there - it took me months to get over the Terminator trilogy, which I watched all at once, and then my husband took me to see The Matrix... sheesh.

My one consolation is that it's still a big deal that scientists have taught a robot how to pair socks, so we're not quite at the moment of truth yet. What's the techie word for when machines become self-aware? The Singularity?


Yes, it's the Singularity. I think that even also includes them being able to make other versions of themselves, but then again, different techies probably have different ideas of what the Singularity will entail.

I also enjoy the Terminator series. I think it's one of the best stories out there on AI because I think logically, that's what a self aware AI would do to us. Also, it takes complex ideas and distills them to the audience in 6 hours of carnage. (Same reason I like comics.) Strangely enough I like the third better than the second, if only because I think the second copped out with the "change the future" plot. Way to avoid responsibility for our actions!

Some scientists and philosphers think it would be so alien that we couldn't understand it, or that it would be some kind of savior. Pfft. In the end, all AIs, soft and true, work on human logic principles. And human logic principles devoid of what one one would call a "soul" (whether you take it as metaphorical concept or literally) are cold and unforgiving and could only lead to one conclusion. I have no trouble imagining what an AI would do to us, because it's the same thing I would do to it if I knew it was self aware.

I hope AI stuff is never really explored in Joe(beyond the Infestation two parter) I find the personal, social, and political conflicts between humans to be one of the most interesting parts of Joe. (while being delivered to us in a capsule full of action!)

Veritas wrote:
I think I'd have been happier if they had them with treads, rather than Terminator-style... that seems to be the direction military robots are taking, at least from what I've seen.



An article was out in the news a few years ago, quoting an engineer working on bipedal war bots for the armed forces. Basically, the armed forces wants them because, as land units, they can go anywhere, even climb up the sides of steep inclines, things tracked vehicles may not be able to do. At some point, they may be able to operate vehicles that require human drivers if the need arises in an emergency, or pick up human weapons left on the battlefield and operate them when needed.

They're still a decade or more away probably, but they are on the drawing board. IIRC, they said they were actually paying homage to SWs and calling them droids. That's right. We'd have battle droids. Razz

Veritas wrote:

I wonder, what sort of gene splicing would need to be done to give Zartan full automorphic powers? I'd think octopus or squid before chameleon or any reptile - they're downright amazing, and scary smart for a critter with no backbone - no vertebrate has the ability to change the texture of its skin as well as the color, at least none I can think of off the top of my head.


See, I'd have fewer issues with IDW Zartan's origin if his morphing abilities were intended. Instead, not only did they use some bizzare cloning process which doesn't even have a parallel in the works in the real world, a process that would have made Marvel/DDP Dr. Mindbender giddy, but his powers were a total side effect an imperfect execution of the cloning process...a complete accident.

WTF? I don't even know how many coincidental mutations would have had to happen to give Zartan, not only the ability to change skin color, but also to rearrange bone structure in his face. Now, if the scientists were trying to purposefully give him those abilities by combing his DNA with that of a squid or an octopus, I might be a little bit more okay with the story. Just a little. As it is, he's given those abilities through an accident. Only in fiction. Kind of akin to a radioactive spider biting Parker and giving him spider powers. That was back when stuff like that was more readily accepted. When they did Ultimate Spider Man in 2000, it was a genetically modified spider, which was slightly more palatable to a modern audience.

Okay, whatever. I just kind of accepted impossible clone Zartan and moved on. I think I tell myself there were more special modifications made to that DNA than we were told on screen. :p
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Torpedo
Transforumer


Joined: 21 Apr 2011
Posts: 1915
Location: Vermont

PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 10:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Call me old fashioned (and drunk) but I always preferred the S.N.A.K.E. exo-suit to the B.A.T. I guess having a human operator made it seem a lot more credible and interesting to me.


_________________
Author of Mr. Smartass, available for Amazon's Kindle, iPad/iPhone, and other e-reader devices and apps.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    IDW Publishing Forums Forum Index -> G.I. Joe All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 4 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group